sitemap - feedback

 

Dividual

Posted on: Tuesday, December 11, 2018

I turned on the music to help me sleep and it subverted me, splitting me into parts. Violins I think it was mostly but it seemed to be a system of tonal strands that sliced me like a kitchen instrument for eggs. Me like a hard-boiled-soft egg not feeling pain. Liberated into fragments. Why would I pull myself together when I can be this.

. . . while the social media user is still subjectified qua individual, the algorithmic governance of social media breaks down each user’s profile on the basis of discrete actions she performs vis-à-vis other users. These dividual electronic transactions, as Gilles Deleuze famously termed them, are the basic unit of informational capital, which recombines the data we leave behind in a potentially infinite variety of data sets.

– Marco Desiriis(1)

Why would you trap me in one body. But why would you trap my parts and make bodies out of them. I am my actions. My actions are me. More than anything we’re inclined to call ourselves by what we do. A reason for silence. But in silence what moves.

What do names and designations actually convey? History, placing, a set of associations, a function. In his essay on “The Politics of Condividuality,” quoted above, Marco Deseriis refers to a linguistically impoverished website, 4chan, whose signature is anonymity. Every post is from “Anonymous.” “Anonymous is a transindividual condividual that operates as an entity in itself, combining dividual & pre-dividual aspects of many individuals. If names aren’t given, then there is a new formation.”(2)

In this new formation, you communicate in a thematic thread and unite with others in this aspect of yourself. Face, name, history and behavioral credentials are absent. Freedom to be a statistic, freedom to slice and slide, be molecular. The question is, how individual can we ever be?

. . . when a young man recognizes that he is ‘in love,’ he may well feel that he has come to a place where others have come before him, a place with laws of its own that existed before he met them, in which certain things, not unknown from literature and tradition, are now to be done and suffered.

– C. S. Lewis(3)

What is the account of thee, oh maiden?’ said Cuchulaind. ‘Not hard to tell, truly,’ said the maiden, ‘Tara of the women, the whitest of maidens, the [...] of chastity, a prohibition which is not taken, a watchman who sees no one. A modest woman is a worm, a scaldcrow [...] a rush which none come near. The daughter of a king, a flame of honour, a road that cannot be entered [...] I have champions that follow me to guard me from whoever will take me against their pleasure, without their and Forgall's knowledge of my act.’
. . . 
The women of Ulster loved Cuchulaind greatly for his quickness at the feats, for the nimbleness of his leap, for the excellency of his wisdom; for the sweetness of his speech, for the beauty of his face, for the loveliness of his look.

The Wooing of Emer / Tochmarc Emire, Kuno Meyer transl.(4)

Emer was said to have “the six gifts—the gift of beauty, the gift of voice, the gift of sweet speech, the gift of needle-work, the gift of wisdom, the gift of chastity.” Replace needle-work and chastity with a professional degree and sexual candour, and reincarnate the desirable Emer in the twenty-first century.

The best representation of individual fact, it seems to me, is dividual works of literature. Theodor Adorno wrote that the “paradox specific to the lyric work, a subjectivity that turns into objectivity, is tied to the priority of linguistic form in the lyric . . .”(5) The poet becomes universal, thus recognisably individual, by working intensely with the inherently social medium of language. Adorno goes on to claim that the artist is effectively possessed by a socially imbued resistive force:

. . . resistance to social pressure is not something absolutely individual; the artistic forces in that resistance, which operate in and through the individual and his spontaneity, are objective forces that impel a constricted and constricting social condition to transcend itself and become worthy of human beings; forces, that is, that are part of the constitution of the whole and not at all merely forces of a rigid individuality blindly opposing society.”(6)

Adrienne Rich also speaks of “forces.” In “Twenty-one Love Poems,” XVII, they are the forces of patriarchy:

and these are the forces they had ranged against us,
and these are the forces we had ranged within us,
within us and against us, against us and within us.(7)

While Dylan Thomas claimed a poet’s individuality, his characters, by his own admission, are all “pasteboard.”(8) They are types or qualities, whether in his play, Under Milkwood, in his stories, or in the poems. In The Map of Love, the boy and girl are “weathers,” propelled by an omniscient mapmaker.(9)

Are we reduced to theme or elevated to theme? Perhaps it depends on the usage. If I’m simply the website “hit” exploited by advertisers, it’s obvious reduction. If I’m the quality of kindness, wit, inspiration or courage, it may be elevation—as long as contrary themes are not discovered, in which case I may be struck out of the scenario and denounced as an inadequate “individual.”

Adorno opposes lyric poetry to the domination of humans by commodities.(10) In “Education after Auschwitz,” he says that people who fetishize technology are unable to love.(11) While I respect the substance of the statement, I’m not sure that techies aren’t perfectly capable of a behaviour just as desirable as the libidinal that is truly tolerant and lasting. The traditional protocol of love has always demanded the self to be of a certain standard. ‘You’ are highlighted. Like religion, love focuses on the individual as the seat of so-called redemption. You are the responsible one. You must submit to the collective notion of correct behaviour or You are defective. Such excessive focus on the individual is just as constraining as division into themes or functions, although it feels warmer.

A particular polarity comes to mind. In his book, Sexuality in Islam, Abdelwahab Bouhdiba says that “One function of sexuality resides in its ability to unite individuals to the community . . . In the strict sense there is no solitary practice of the sexual life.”(12) Whereas Félix Guattari asserts that capitalism, in recreating and assimilating the individual for the purpose of commoditisation, engenders a prescribed set of desires. Real desire, he says, is all-embracing, involved with everything, transsexual: we must move beyond the “individual,” transcend our sedentary selves and our normal social identities to travel the boundaryless territory of the body, “in order to live in the flux of desires that lies beyond sexuality . . .”(13)

Emerge from sleep and slide into something less comfortable.

(NEXT BLOG: FEBRUARY 2019)
-----------------------
Footnotes

(1) Marco Deseriis. “The Politics of Condividuality.” Transversal Journal: Technecologies, March 2018.
(2) Ibid.
(3) The Allegory of Love. Oxford University Press, 1959, 130.
(4) Leabhar na hUidre. Translated by Kuno Meyer. Celt Project.
(5) Notes to Literature, Volume I. Ed. Rolf Tiedemann. Transl. Shierry Weber Nicholsen. New York: Columbia University Press, 1991, 43.
(6) Ibid. P. 43.
(7) The Dream of a Common Language. New York/London: W. W. Norton & Co., 1978.
(8) Letter to Trevor Hughes, Feb 1933. The Collected Letters. Ed. Paul Ferris. London: Paladin, 1987, 13.
(9) The Map of Love. London: J. M. Dent & Sons Ltd, 1939.
(10) Op. cit. 39/40.
(11) “Education after Auschwitz.” 
(12) Sexuality in Islam. Translated by Alan Sheridan. London: Saqi, 2012, 96.
(13) Chaosophy: Texts and Interviews 1972-1977. Semiotext(e), 2009, 210.


Other recent blog items

Blue Arrow Dividual
  Posted on: Tuesday, December 11, 2018
Blue Arrow Stress Births
  Posted on: Saturday, November 10, 2018
Blue Arrow Satisfactions
  Posted on: Monday, October 08, 2018
Blue Arrow Muted
  Posted on: Saturday, September 08, 2018
Blue Arrow Call Upon the Author
  Posted on: Saturday, August 11, 2018
Blue Arrow Need to Know
  Posted on: Wednesday, July 04, 2018
Blue Arrow Selfie
  Posted on: Monday, June 04, 2018
Blue Arrow The Long Truth
  Posted on: Wednesday, May 02, 2018
Blue Arrow Possession
  Posted on: Monday, April 02, 2018
Blue Arrow Resistance
  Posted on: Saturday, March 03, 2018
Blue Arrow New Found Land
  Posted on: Saturday, February 03, 2018
Blue Arrow Framed: Tales of the Koanan #6
  Posted on: Monday, January 01, 2018
Blue Arrow Stop! Go!
  Posted on: Wednesday, December 06, 2017
Blue Arrow Portrait
  Posted on: Thursday, November 02, 2017
Blue Arrow The Formal Network of the Lie
  Posted on: Monday, July 03, 2017
Blue Arrow Political is Personal
  Posted on: Monday, June 05, 2017
Blue Arrow Ideas of Order
  Posted on: Thursday, May 04, 2017
Blue Arrow Dark Reading (Roethke)
  Posted on: Saturday, April 01, 2017
Blue Arrow Mutatis Mutandis: A Reading of 'The Disquieting Muses' by Sylvia Plath
  Posted on: Thursday, March 02, 2017
Blue Arrow Perplexing Pronomials: Tales of the Koanan #5
  Posted on: Friday, February 03, 2017
Blue Arrow Aerial Approach / Pre-text
  Posted on: Thursday, January 05, 2017
Blue Arrow Walking with Ammons and Carson
  Posted on: Friday, December 02, 2016
Blue Arrow Face the Wall (fragments)
  Posted on: Sunday, November 06, 2016
Blue Arrow Blog October 2016: Product
  Posted on: Sunday, October 02, 2016
Blue Arrow The Eye that Primes the Canvas
  Posted on: Friday, September 02, 2016
Blue Arrow Escape: Parvit of Agelast
  Posted on: Sunday, August 07, 2016
Blue Arrow No
  Posted on: Friday, July 01, 2016
Blue Arrow A Reading of 'Indoors' by Eavan Boland
  Posted on: Wednesday, June 01, 2016
Blue Arrow The Look: A Reading of 'The Lioness' by Adrienne Rich
  Posted on: Sunday, May 01, 2016
Blue Arrow The Dental Contract
  Posted on: Friday, April 01, 2016
Blue Arrow A Reading of Michael Hartnett's 'Epitaph for John Kelly, Blacksmith'
  Posted on: Wednesday, March 02, 2016
Blue Arrow A Reading of Medbh McGuckian’s ‘Sidereum Iter (His Journey through the Stars)’
  Posted on: Sunday, January 31, 2016
Blue Arrow Farewell to the Blog
  Posted on: Tuesday, July 28, 2015
Blue Arrow An Old Fragment
  Posted on: Saturday, June 27, 2015
Blue Arrow Private
  Posted on: Tuesday, May 26, 2015
Blue Arrow Architectonics
  Posted on: Tuesday, April 28, 2015
Blue Arrow Score
  Posted on: Friday, March 27, 2015
Blue Arrow Armoire
  Posted on: Saturday, February 28, 2015
Blue Arrow Undoing Peace (Lives of the Koanan #4)
  Posted on: Monday, January 26, 2015
Blue Arrow Like One More Wave
  Posted on: Saturday, November 29, 2014
Blue Arrow Beasts, Priests and Virgins: Dylan Thomas and the Love Concept
  Posted on: Sunday, October 26, 2014
Blue Arrow Sane
  Posted on: Saturday, September 27, 2014
Blue Arrow A Girl is a Sliced Fruit
  Posted on: Wednesday, August 27, 2014
Blue Arrow Peace (Lives of the Koanan #3)
  Posted on: Sunday, July 27, 2014
Blue Arrow Shit
  Posted on: Friday, June 27, 2014
Blue Arrow Expressing the Source: Eavan Boland and Adrienne Rich
  Posted on: Monday, May 26, 2014
Blue Arrow A Little Smaller than the Entire Universe
  Posted on: Sunday, April 27, 2014
Blue Arrow Fronts (Lives of the Koanan #2)
  Posted on: Monday, March 31, 2014
Blue Arrow Act
  Posted on: Thursday, February 27, 2014
Blue Arrow Present and Unaccounted For
  Posted on: Monday, January 27, 2014
Blue Arrow Xs
  Posted on: Thursday, November 28, 2013
Blue Arrow Pleasure
  Posted on: Sunday, October 27, 2013
Blue Arrow Amateur
  Posted on: Friday, September 27, 2013
Blue Arrow Wasted Time
  Posted on: Tuesday, August 27, 2013
Blue Arrow Apathy
  Posted on: Friday, July 26, 2013
Blue Arrow A Kinder Time
  Posted on: Thursday, June 27, 2013
Blue Arrow Where Spirituality Lies
  Posted on: Monday, May 27, 2013
Blue Arrow Firmament or Fear?
  Posted on: Monday, April 29, 2013